A learning system for addressing persistent disadvantage

We engaged FrankAdvice to prepare a report setting out potential features of a learning system. The Productivity Commission intends to use this work to inform their findings and recommendations in relation to a stronger public management learning system.
FrankAdvice gathered information through a range of approaches including a partnership with the Productivity Commission to run a key thinkers workshop, case studies, and a scan of relevant literature from New Zealand and overseas.
The report considers what ‘learning system’ means, and what a good learning system might look like. It then sets out the key players and key components in a learning system to understand where the gaps are, and the actions that would be needed to address them.
The report identifies what features a learning system should include to address persistent disadvantage. These include:
- Sharing and synthesising knowledge across the public management system.
- Including diverse views and perspectives to help shape those decisions as well as judge the impacts. In particular, people who are affected by government decisions.
- Helping policymakers take decisions that work, now and in the future.
- Taking an intergenerational lens, which includes ensuring the impacts of decisions over time are evaluated.
In their report FrankAdvice outlines six key components of an effective learning system: knowledge generation and use, leadership and accountability, and capacity and capability. The report sets out potential actions under each component to support the learning system to effectively address persistent disadvantage. The report’s actions include:
- Establishing an all-of-government leadership function, to make sure the Crown plays its part in a learning system with Māori represented at all levels.
- Establishing a government-wide knowledge policy that includes evaluation and setting requirements and standards of practice for government agencies.
- Ensure government agencies work with people to understand and evaluate what matters to them, as determined by them.
- Take a strengths-based approach to evaluation, take a broad understanding of knowledge, and be cognisant of who decides what counts as knowledge.
- Establish a (separate) centre of excellence for the learning system and place a requirement on agencies to dedicate resourcing to evaluation.
This report provides input to inform our thinking for our inquiry into A Fair Chance for All: Breaking the cycle of persistent disadvantage.
The content and recommendations presented in the report are the views of the author. They are not an indication that the Commission agrees with or endorses these views.
Publications
Filter publications by topic.
3 July 2023
1 May 2023
30 March 2023
28 February 2023
28 February 2023
27 February 2023
27 February 2023
20 February 2023
23 December 2022
21 December 2022
15 November 2022
29 September 2022
18 July 2022
30 June 2022
9 June 2022
31 May 2022
28 May 2022
28 May 2022
1 April 2022
15 December 2021
1 December 2021
14 November 2021
8 November 2021
8 November 2021
8 November 2021
8 November 2021
27 September 2021
1 September 2021
19 July 2021
27 May 2021
21 April 2021
21 April 2021
20 April 2021
20 April 2021
1 April 2021
25 February 2021
4 December 2020
30 November 2020
4 September 2020
31 August 2020
30 June 2020
30 June 2020
28 April 2020
18 March 2020
9 March 2020
19 February 2020
16 December 2019
30 November 2019
16 October 2019
16 August 2019
7 June 2019
16 May 2019
1 March 2019
14 February 2019
1 February 2019
1 February 2019
24 December 2018
14 November 2018
31 August 2018
1 August 2018
20 March 2018
22 February 2018
23 November 2017
23 November 2017
1 November 2017
29 September 2017
1 June 2017
21 March 2017
28 February 2017
20 February 2017
16 December 2016
28 November 2016
27 April 2016
12 January 2016
1 December 2015
29 June 2015
29 May 2015
29 May 2015
5 February 2015
21 January 2015
5 June 2014
5 June 2014
1 March 2014
19 December 2013
20 September 2013
16 July 2013