1 January 2018
Download [845 KB PDF]Between 1996 and 2016 Auckland’s population increased by 499,000, or by slightly more than the increase in the rest of New Zealand. Yet only half the number of building permits were issued in Auckland as in the rest of the country. To understand this difference, this paper uses regional data to investigate how population growth affects residential construction. It estimates that if Auckland had built houses at the same rate as the rest of the country (adjusted for population growth) it would have needed to have built an additional 40 – 55,000 dwellings during the period – and needed nearly 9000 more construction sector workers. The shortfall was modest until 2005, but sharply accelerated due to the cessation of apartment building in central Auckland. The results show the large increase in the average size of dwellings was not a major factor in Auckland’s shortfall relative to the rest of the country as new dwellings were smaller in Auckland than elsewhere.
The estimates further suggest population change may be ‘hyper-expansionary’ as the residential construction demand associated with an additional person is higher than the output they produce. In these circumstances, population increases raise the demand for labour and create pressure for additional inward migration, potentially explaining why migration-fueled boom-bust cycles may occur.
The goal of our research is to facilitate a move from an economy that grows by using more “inputs” (such as labour or natural resources), to one where productivity plays a greater role in driving economic growth – essentially, working smarter, with greater financial and knowledge capital employed per worker.
Our research explores a wide range of productivity issues: employment, firm dynamics, technology diffusion, innovation, regional development, spatial and public-sector productivity.
The commissioning of research and the practice of collaboration with others is important to us. It enables us to access subject/sector specialists and benefit from the cross-promotion of ideas and insights. You will find research from the Commission, as well as research we commissioned, below.
Our Economics & Research team is independently evaluated every two years to understand how to improve and enhance our impact. See the latest evaluation report and 2020 survey results here.
27 February 2023
21 December 2022
18 July 2022
31 May 2022
28 May 2022
28 May 2022
14 November 2021
8 November 2021
8 November 2021
8 November 2021
8 November 2021
27 May 2021
21 April 2021
21 April 2021
20 April 2021
20 April 2021
25 February 2021
4 December 2020
30 November 2020
4 September 2020
31 August 2020
30 June 2020
28 April 2020
18 March 2020
9 March 2020
19 February 2020
30 November 2019
16 October 2019
16 August 2019
7 June 2019
14 February 2019
1 February 2019
1 February 2019
24 December 2018
14 November 2018
1 August 2018
20 March 2018
22 February 2018
23 November 2017
23 November 2017
1 November 2017
29 September 2017
1 June 2017
20 February 2017
16 December 2016
28 November 2016
27 April 2016
12 January 2016
1 December 2015
29 June 2015
29 May 2015
29 May 2015
5 February 2015
21 January 2015
5 June 2014
5 June 2014
1 March 2014
19 December 2013
20 September 2013
16 July 2013
