29 June 2015
DownloadsThis paper examines the impact of government assistance through R&D grants on innovation output for firms in New Zealand.
Using a large database that links administrative and tax data with survey data, we are able to control for large number of firm characteristics and thus minimise selection bias. We find that receipt of an R&D grant significantly increases the probability that a firm in the manufacturing and service sectors applies for a patent during 2005–2009, but no positive impact is found on the probability of applying for a trademark.
Using only firms that participated in the Business Operation Survey, we find that receiving a grant almost doubles the probability that a firm introduces new goods and services to the world while its effects on process innovation and any product innovation are relatively much weaker.
Moreover, there is little evidence that grant receipt has differential effects between small to medium (<50 employees) and larger firms. These findings are broadly in line with recent international evidence from Japan, Canada and Italy which found positive impacts of public R&D subsidy on patenting activity and the introduction of new products.
This Motu Working Paper 15-08 was produced under the Longitudinal Business Database Partnership, along with “Measuring the innovative activity of New Zealand firms”, by Simon Wakeman (NZPC) and Trinh Le (Motu). The research was funded by the Productivity Hub under the Longitudinal Business Database Productivity Partnership programme.
Keywords Industrial policy, innovation, R&D
JEL codes O31, O34, O38
The goal of our research is to facilitate a move from an economy that grows by using more “inputs” (such as labour or natural resources), to one where productivity plays a greater role in driving economic growth – essentially, working smarter, with greater financial and knowledge capital employed per worker.
Our research explores a wide range of productivity issues: employment, firm dynamics, technology diffusion, innovation, regional development, spatial and public-sector productivity.
The commissioning of research and the practice of collaboration with others is important to us. It enables us to access subject/sector specialists and benefit from the cross-promotion of ideas and insights. You will find research from the Commission, as well as research we commissioned, below.
Our Economics & Research team is independently evaluated every two years to understand how to improve and enhance our impact. See the latest evaluation report and 2020 survey results here.
27 February 2023
21 December 2022
18 July 2022
31 May 2022
28 May 2022
28 May 2022
14 November 2021
8 November 2021
8 November 2021
8 November 2021
8 November 2021
27 May 2021
21 April 2021
21 April 2021
20 April 2021
20 April 2021
25 February 2021
4 December 2020
30 November 2020
4 September 2020
31 August 2020
30 June 2020
28 April 2020
18 March 2020
9 March 2020
19 February 2020
30 November 2019
16 October 2019
16 August 2019
7 June 2019
14 February 2019
1 February 2019
1 February 2019
24 December 2018
14 November 2018
1 August 2018
20 March 2018
22 February 2018
23 November 2017
23 November 2017
1 November 2017
29 September 2017
1 June 2017
20 February 2017
16 December 2016
28 November 2016
27 April 2016
12 January 2016
1 December 2015
29 June 2015
29 May 2015
29 May 2015
5 February 2015
21 January 2015
5 June 2014
5 June 2014
1 March 2014
19 December 2013
20 September 2013
16 July 2013
